With
more than a third of the season gone, and our game in hand having been played, we
have reached the stage where the stats and the league don’t lie. Yesterday’s
disappointing defeat means that instead of raising ourselves up to the middle
of the pack we sit fifth from bottom (albeit with a points cushion). It’s
reasonable to ask what’s wrong with us, not on the grounds that we’re below
teams we would not expect to be (we have no divine right to be above anyone,
except for the obvious, and we can hardly complain having lost to Millwall,
Bournemouth and others) but because we have quite frankly struggled since the
opening day to achieve any sort of consistency in terms of results and performances.
If
there was a realistic objective for this season it was to progress. A
ninth-place finish to last season perhaps did us no favours by suggesting that
progress would have to mean competing for a top-six finish. The relative absence
of team strengthening in the summer perhaps put paid to any such thoughts, so
progress might amount to consolidating in/around mid-table. But after 17 games
we have 17 points; after 17 last season we had 23, not a massive difference but
hardly a move in the right direction. I think there were mitigating
circumstances for the lacklustre start to the season (one point from the first
three games, almost the first four) given that two forwards came in just before
the campaign kicked off after three from last season had departed. Undoubtedly
being without Solly and Cort has hurt us, as has Kermorgant’s injury, while to
date Sordell has had little impact (the goal against Forest being his one
moment so far).
If
there is a simple answer (there seldom is but sometimes there are root causes),
I’d suggest it’s lack of ambition, beginning off the pitch but now on it too.
As a club we are in a state of limbo. I’ve no idea if we are on the verge of
being bought; equally I’ve no idea if there have been issues with payment of
wages, as has been indicated by others. What is apparent is that, for whatever
reason (and I’m still inclined to view fair play rules as a smokescreen), the
current owners are unable or unwilling to follow through on the stated goal of
taking us back to the Premiership (of course not in one/two seasons but moving
towards that goal). A sympathetic interpretation would be that the fair play
rules and a promising crop of youngsters have combined to effectively put a
stop to significant investment in the squad in the hope that in a year or two
the youngsters will have come through.
Trouble
is, if you start a campaign with limited expectations and ambitions it cannot
but spread to the attitude of the players. I’m not questioning their character
and commitment, they have demonstrated those qualities often enough (and when
under pressure continue to do so). But how can you have real confidence, and
bravery, if the comings and goings send the message that the team’s real
objective this season is to avoid relegation, that you, collectively, aren’t
good enough to achieve more? I don’t think it’s an accident that when Arsenal
signed Ozil it lifted every player they had, to up their performance. I’m not
suggesting we might have signed an Ozil but the principle still stands.
Let
me try to elaborate with reference to games. We know in terms of results our
linked problems are home form and scoring goals. What is the simple difference
between playing at home and playing away? Surely it’s expectations and the fact
that at home the onus is on you to go out and win the game. I’ve not seen one
match this season when we’ve gone out and taken the game by the scruff of the
neck, imposed ourselves on the opposition. Leicester at home may be a partial
exception, but we always beat them (perhaps an expectation there too?). The
stirring performance against Forest came out of adversity, having gone behind early
on (as with Cardiff last season). There was a sense that night that we had
nothing to lose by being adventurous and it paid off, not least as Forest must
have felt after 20 minutes that the game was already theirs and they felt no
inclination to simply shut up shop. Millwall and Ipswich were content to defend
in depth and in these two games we seldom unsettled their defences.
There’s
a real difference between coming through under pressure and from adversity and
having a winning mentality, the confidence and bravery to go out from the start
with the belief that you will win, or at least are good enough to stand
head-to-toe with the opposition. Fear of losing, especially in front of your
own fans, creates pressure and causes inhibitions (play the safe pass etc).
What was missing yesterday, as against Millwall in particular, was the
confidence to take a chance to make something happen, risking making mistakes.
That, for me, is a mindset problem, albeit one hard to get rid of when our home
record speaks for itself. When you struggle to create chances to score
something of the belief that you will take them when they arise disappears (and
let’s not forget that we missed most of the easy ones against Doncaster and
broke the deadlock with a screamer from outside the box).
If
the mindset isn’t right, is the team selection optimum? Without Solly or Cort,
in defence the only current question is whether Dervite or Wood gets the nod
alongside Morrison, given that Wiggins’ form after an iffy start to the season
means there’s no current case for bringing in Evina, other than perhaps on the
left of midfield. Up front, with Kermorgant getting back to match fitness,
there is a selection issue. Church’s movement and workrate are exemplary, but
as his career record indicates he is not a prolific goalscorer. Sordell has been
but is coming to us off the back of a so far unsuccessful transfer to Bolton.
So far for us he started the opening two games (I didn’t see either), was
dropped for the next four, came in for one, was dropped for the next two, came
back for three games, and has been left out for the past six. I’m not saying he
should be given an extended run – clearly we would lose a good deal if Church
doesn’t start – but there is a case, not least as a fully-functioning
Kermorgant will provide the service. At the least, if Sordell is to come off
the bench when we’re chasing a game, he has to be given more time than he was
yesterday. If after 17 games your top scorer is on three (from six starts for
Kermorgant, from 14 for Church) the chances are you’re not going to like
looking at the league table.
It’s
also clear that from the start of the season we haven’t found a consistently
effective central midfield combination, whether in a 4-4-2 or 4-5-1. We’re
choosing between Jackson, Stephens, Cousins, Gower and Hughes (leaving aside
Pritchard or Harriott whether central or in the hole). Of these, only Stephens
has started in more than 10 of the 17 games, so there’s been no consistency of
selection. Jackson’s injury hasn’t helped and especially yesterday he looked
below par playing back out wide left, Cousins has undoubtedly been a plus this season
but does seem to limit his expectations to providing defensive cover and
playing neat passes, which is fine if there’s a driving force alongside him.
Stephens is the true playmaker and has been doing well, but his game isn’t
box-to-box and when the opposition defend in numbers we don’t seem to have the
guile, perhaps the devil, in our play to turn possession into chances.
Currently
the midfield isn’t chipping in with enough goals, Kermorgant and Jackson seem
to have forgotten how to get the free kicks on target, and without Cort the
defence isn’t notching a few from corners/set pieces. Every good team knows its
strengths and plays to them. We are currently short on pace and drive from
midfield (Stewart being the obvious exception), a poacher in the box, or some
other source of goals.
To
be positive, I’m confident that we have the ability and character to avoid
relegation. But can it go pear-shaped? Of course it can, if confidence is
further eroded and/or if the situation off the pitch has a draining effect on
morale. We all hope that the ownership issue is sorted out soon, one way or the
other, and that a positive outcome can inject some fresh sense of direction and
ambition. Absent that, perhaps either the team carries on as to date,
inconsistent and unambitious. Or with or without some tweaking in formation and
selection they can get themselves together with Sir Chris and his staff and set
themselves higher goals, remembering that they are capable of more.
5 comments:
i Understand what yore saying, as you put it at the end Sir Chris???? is this the problem he is a legend here yes but???? is he Learning from mistakes as a manager????
Correcton ! i Understand what your sayin as you put it at the end Sir Chris???? Is he the problem, Yes he is a legend here but???? is he Learning from mistakes as a manager????all the games so far i belive not.
Didn't mean to imply that Sir Chris is part of the problem. Don't see it that way. I think he's central to what are our major assets at the moment. There may be an element of him still learning his trade, but nothing's perfect and what he brings to us (IMO) massively outweighs relative inexperience as an actual manager (although if Championship managers keep going at the current rate he will be a veteran soon).
Our problem seems to be creating and scoring enough goals. The defence has been ok in most games, our goals against total is OK, but on goals for we are way behind most other teams.
We can attribute some of this to Kermo's long absence, but the other strikers haven't looked like scoring enough goals; Piggot too young, Sordell not effective, and Church, despite all his hard wwork doesn't look likely to score enough.
Until Saturday I thought that a Kermo and Jackson forward line might be worth a try, but with Jackson now banned for three matches, another short term fix is needed. So how about Kermo and Stewart a forward partnership, and freshen up the midfield with Evina or Green from the subs bench ?
It is looking like a tough call for Sir Chris. But we'll be taking on an in-form and confident Derby team, so I'd even consider playing one up front (presumably Kermorgant) and five in midfield, possibly playing Stewart (or Harriot or Pritchard) in the hole.
We have to find a way to hurt teams as any opposition looking at our recent record will feel that if they get ahead in a game and then get behind the ball we are unlikely to score.
Post a Comment