After
a lazy long holiday weekend and a balmy afternoon, and given our position in
the league (before heading back to Lyon today my partner Suzanne asked me if we
would go higher than 11th if we won, and it seemed we could go up a place if we
won by an eight-goal margins, or drop a place if we lost by four), there was an
unavoidable end-of-season feel ahead of tonight's game, intensified by the
prospect of giving a decent welcome back to both Curbs and Scotty Parker and
even the thought that having failed to deny Millwall the points the only decent
thing to do was give some to Fulham, just to keep their heads above water for
an obvious reason (except that, while having no ill-will whatsoever towards
Fulham and not being one to bear a grudge, I struggle to draw a veil over that
equaliser in the Premiership). Question was would the players feel the same, or
give us a decent evening's entertainment.
In
the event it was a reasonable enough game, albeit one that failed to turn into
the goal-fest that looked possible in the first half, when both sides looked
highly likely to notch more than one on the night. If anything the second half
petered out rather tamely, which did tend to highlight the mystifying, and
embarrassing, booing of Parker. I was ready to give him a standing ovation, he
deserves no less. I hope he has better memories of The Valley than the late
exchange with some fans after he nearly crocked himself in the boardings after
a challenge by Fox.
The
team was fairly predictable. With Solly unavailable, Gomez took his spot, with
Ben Haim returning to partner Johnson, while Bulot came in for Eagles on the
left side. Diarra, Cousins and Berg Gudmundsson completed the midfield, with
Watt and Vetokele paired up front.
After
a fairly even start, Fulham showed they had the ability to pull apart our
defence, creating space between the two banks of four and getting joy
especially down their right side, where Fox seemed to find himself without any
protection. In the space of about 15 minutes they created four decent openings
and, with Johnson and Ben Haim during that period seemingly chasing shadows,
might have put the game beyond reach. The one they did score came from a fairly
routine ball into the box which their tall centre-forward headed square and
McCormack read faster than our centre-backs, stealing a march to head the ball
over a stranded Henderson.
The
space Fulham were finding/creating at that stage of the game threatened more,
with Henderson called into action a few times. But at the other end it was
becoming apparent why only Blackpool have conceded more goals than them this
season. A bit of pressure applied and they were equally all at sea, especially
when the ball was kept on the deck. The equaliser nevertheless had a tinge of
controversy about it, even though I think the officials got it right (according
to the offside rule as I understand it). Fox got in down the left and put in a
low cross, which saw a clearly offside Bulot (I am informed) stretch to try to
convert it only to fail to get a touch, with the ball running on to
Gudmundsson, who had come through from a clearly onside position and who
managed to divert it into the roof of the net. There may have been a case for
Bulot having distracted their keeper and interfered with play, but said keeper
was never going to claim the ball or get near Gudmundsson's effort.
That
proved the catalyst for probably our best period of the game, when we should
have added to our total. Watt produced one sublime turn to wrongfoot their
defenders, only to just overhit the pass to Vetokele. But the next time they
combined Watt prodded the ball forward for Igor, with Fulham again looking in
vain to the linesman for a flag. He played it across the goal and Gudmundsson
came onto it at the far post. There was a defender's leg coming towards him and
the angle was a bit tight, but from only a couple of yards out he put it into
the side-netting. It was a bad miss and, though it didn't look likely at the
time, that was to be the best chance for the remainder of the game.
Just
before the break a McCormack free-kick from outside the box produced a decent
save from Henderson, who dived to his left to turn it away. And at the break it
really was anyone's game.
The
surprise was really that in the second half both teams failed to produce
consistently the forward threat that had been evident in the first period.
Perhaps both managers made adjustments to tighten things up, but for us
Gudmundsson, who had run them ragged, featured less, while Vetokele seemed to
be carrying an injury and struggled to get past their defenders when he had a
yard of space. At the other end Fulham had their chances, but they were more
the result of something falling in a crowded box - one clear opportunity was
hoofed over the bar - than the movement they had shown before. There were shots
and near misses at both ends, but nothing clear-cut.
After
the hour Fulham made a double-substitution and shortly after Eagles came on for
Bulot, who had shown a couple of deft touches but was largely peripheral. With
about 10 minutes left Church came on for the tiring Vetokele but the game was
really petering out to a rather tame draw when the referee decided to inject
some possible late drama by awarding Fulham another soft free-kick outside the
box. But McCormack curled it over the bar and that was pretty much it.
Over
the 90+ minutes we may have just about shaded it, largely on the grounds that
having equalised we had the best chance to win the game. But Fulham could point
to that early period when defensively we looked disorganised and might have
conceded more than one, as well as a couple of second-half shots. A draw was
probably a fair result.
Player
Ratings:
Henderson
- 8/10. Couple of excellent saves, dealt well with any high balls in the box,
and no chance with the goal (although he was off his line and perhaps made it
easy for McCormack to see the opportunity to loop his header over him into the
net).
Gomez
- 7/10. Another assured performance,
defensively sound after the collective failures of the early period and seems
to have the ability to stroke in some delightful, testing crosses.
Fox
- 6/10. Not sure it was entirely his fault that most of their threat in the
first half came down his side, he seemed to be left on his own a fair bit and
they exploited the space.
Ben
Haim - 6/10. Along with Johnson got more to grips with their forwards after the
first 20 mins, but during that time we were vulnerable.
Johnson
- 6/10. Much the same, can't say why we were seemingly easily pulled apart
early on.
Berg
Gudmundsson - 8/10. Ran them ragged in the first half in particular, would have
been a clear man-of-the-match had he converted his second chance (which he
should have done).
Diarra
- 7/10. Neat and tidy, did a job. Decent addition for next season.
Cousins
- 7/10. Seemed to struggle a bit in the first half but more effective in the
second, some timely interceptions.
Bulot
- 6/10. Threatened a few times down the flank, but nothing telling came from
them.
Watt
- 7/10. Once again was able to produce almost out of nothing a few moments that
almost turned the game, couple of shots that went narrowly wide.
Vetokele
- 6/10. Didn't look fully fit to me tonight and without the extra bit of pace
struggled.
Subs
- Eagles (6/10: nothing dramatic and was caught in possession a couple of
times); Church (6/10: no great impact on the game in the final 10 minutes or
so).
4 comments:
The abuse of Parker is just embarrassing, especially as many of those doing it were probably still in nappies when he played for us. A good player whose departure was badly managed on all sides. Perhaps one of the best players I've ever seen pull on a Charlton shirt. As for the game, typical end of season kickabout.
I thought it was the home side that petered out, BA, and also started timidly for the third or fourth game in succession. I began to wonder whether the time-machine had whisked us back to Selhurst where Big Bob was regularly fishing the ball out of the net in the fifth minute or so. Particularly amazing that Fulham used the short lob device about four times in the first ten and we fell for it every time, though thankfully only conceding once.
Parker was a sublime player for us, a Stuart Leary who could also tackle, but he put the acquisition of a Porsche and the shining of the Chelsea bench above the interests of the club which had nurtured him. He also damaged his own interests, of course, in the sense of the number of England caps he got. Could have been a regular for maybe seven years if he could have waited a season or so for a better opportunity than Stamford Bridge. Even if the boo-boys were in junior school then their dads will have told them, so he made his own bed. On the question of moronic crowd behaviour he did himself no favours in his moronic response to the verbals following his landing in the adverts. He ought to have the class to leave that sort of stuff to Rooney and Barton and Co.
Fair points guys (and on the game I would agree on reflection that we tired and Fulham were more likely than us to win it in the closing stages).
I'd agree that the Parker move to Chelsea was handled badly by all concerned (including our failure to sign a replacement before the window closed). But I've no idea what was promised/said at the time to Parker and wouldn't just conclude that he was a 'greedy bstard' for pushing through the transfer. Yes, we'd nurtured him - and yes, he gave us great service in return.
Parker's played against us since and I don't remember boing before. Why now? Unless the 'thought police' have decided he was a greedy bstard and that becomes their fact. Perhaps it's just because he was booed by West Ham fans when he returned to Upton Park with Spurs, on similar grounds, and some Addicks have just followed the theme. Just don't agree with the thinking (and yes it was a bit poor of him to get involved with the crowd, whatever was said, but am reminded of the bit in Gary Nelson's auto when he was getting abuse when being stretchered off).
.
Yeah thass wot I think n when it comes to Parker I wish the oi pelloi would give it a rest. Less face it all players move on n e did is best for us when e was dahn our gaff n always spoke ighly of the club unlike Danny Murphy who dissed ourn when e left as did is wife. Still a decent drawn for ourn n the BBs often get they were PL lass season.
Post a Comment