So there we have it.
According to Richard Murray it was “an agreement that is best for everyone
involved” and Karl Robinson himself, while “not an easy decision”, what is “best
for the club and everyone involved”. Can’t blame either for making such
comments, but – although I’m not privy to any inside information - let’s get
real: Robinson has had enough and has himself brought about his departure by
first twice offering his resignation and then making sure that the news was
leaked; Charlton have – or rather Duchatelet has - presumably managed to save
on Robinson’s wages and any unfathomable pay-out to Robinson (unless he really
had something to support a case for breach of contract), perhaps even squeezed
something out of Oxford (I’m assuming there’s going to be a decent interval of
at least a day before Robinson is confirmed as their new manager).
There’s no ‘best for
the club’ here, just individuals doing what suits their interests – although of
course it’s possible that the change will actually work to our (ie the club’s)
advantage. If we end up with a turnaround in form and make the play-offs, go on
to fresh glory at Wembley and find ourselves back in the Championship, I’m
ready to hail Robinson ‘falling on his sword’ as the noblest decision in
football for some time. If we don’t make the play-offs, we’ve really lost next
to nothing as we weren’t exactly heading in that direction. (I am assuming here
that we can’t go on such a disastrous run that we manage somehow to get
relegated). We will get some inkling of course on Saturday, from the way the
team is set up and how motivated individual players prove to be.
Given that nobody is
going to be interested in coming in from outside to manage us (unless truly
desperate and offered a contract long enough to make the post-change of
ownership pay-off worthwhile), it does seem as though the only alternative was
to put in charge one or more of Jason Euell, Johnnie Jackson and Lee Bowyer. (I
suppose if Harry Kewell is plucked away from Crawley Town it would be
tantamount to saying that a takeover by the Australians is all but agreed.) It
seems to be Bowyer as caretaker manager, Jackson as his assistant, and Euell
left with the U-23s (which probably makes sense as there’s no point in
prompting even more disruption and as by keeping that role Euell gives himself
the best chance of being retained under new ownership).
We don’t need to go
over Bowyer’s previous; he does surely become the first person to lead Charlton
who we know used to enjoy a spliff (if you check out Dean Chandler on Wikipedia
you find out that after years in the lower leagues/non-league he apparently
made his debut for the England Learning Disability team, playing in a 16-0 win
against hosts Sweden in the Global Games, before being sent off in the next
match, against Brazil, for violent conduct). Perhaps this is why they haven't made him and JJ 'joints managers'. Just why he is given the nod over
Jackson I can’t say, guess you have to be closer to these things to have a
worthwhile opinion.
Bowyer does have
nothing to lose – and hopefully along with JJ will inject some enthusiasm into
the team. If the season tails off with defeat against Plymouth and we are
consigned to another in the third flight (for me, in my lifetime we’ve never
spent more than three consecutive seasons in this division, so it has to be
promotion or bust under new owners for the next campaign) nobody’s going to
blame him in any way. Whether or not he and/or Jackson are retained under new
ownership only time will tell; perhaps JJ was not put in charge so as to increase his chances of being kept on post-takeover.
There is of course
absolutely no good reason for the change to affect CARD’s plans for a return to
protests at The Valley on Easter Monday. We all I’m sure continue to hope that
the protest will not be necessary as a sale is confirmed before then, but
nobody’s holding their breath.
1 comment:
200 top post
Post a Comment