Just what to make of
yesterday? We began the day with Oxford apparently promising an “exciting
announcement”, assumed to be confirmation of a new manager, the position having
been vacant since January (and with the club’s new owner having reportedly said
in February that he expected to make an appointment in the “next couple of days”).
And although Karl Robinson had previously played down the rumours and distanced
himself from the job, the bookies had reinstalled him as odds-on favourite, the
odds on Sven Goran Eriksson apparently lengthening.
We ended the day with
not a word from Oxford, nothing from Charlton officially, but with seemingly
well-sourced reports that Robinson had offered his resignation to Duchatelet not
once but twice. To add to the speculation, reports resurfaced that if the
Australian Football Consortium does end up taking us over current Crawley Town
boss Harry Kewell would be brought to replace Robinson. Just another day in the
tragicomedy that is currently our club.
So basically so far
nothing has actually happened (except that we are one day closer to an end to
Duchatelet’s ownership). Robinson may still be off to Oxford, he may still
resign irrespective, or he may be in situ for Saturday’s game against Plymouth,
one which probably represents our last chance saloon as far as fading play-off
chances are concerned. I think we could all use some clarity before then, which
would be in everyone’s interest.
Perhaps best to separate
out the two issues re Robinson. First, is he trying to jump ship having been
tipped the wink about Oxford (as a convenient – for him – switch given location
and the opportunity to get across a message that he is leaving us because of
broken promises from Duchatelet) or was he instead acknowledging that he is
failing to get us promoted and in taking responsibility for that by rather more
honourably giving the owner the option to replace him? Second, should we be
happy or sad if he is gone before Saturday?
Of course on the
former there’s currently no way to tell. If Oxford announce the appointment of
Robinson it will be up to him to persuade us that he has not behaved badly; in
the absence of any convincing explanation – rather more than ‘I did my best but
...’ - we will probably be left to assume that he has, irrespective of the
lunacy of Duchatelet’s ‘stewardship’ (there would be a certain irony in that
for most of his time with us Roland has been sacking coaches but now he would
have seen his trusted CEO and a manager walk away from him). If they announce
the appointment of someone else, there would still be a need for some comment
from Robinson on the resignation reports. It’s not as if he isn’t going to get
asked at every press conference from now on.
How we would feel
about him going or not will in part I suspect be conditioned by what is said re
Oxford. Nobody can blame Robinson for wanting to get away from Duchatelet – and
the line that he was let down in January would carry some conviction – and being
tired of the lame duck position he finds himself in vis-a-vis the drawn out
takeover. But he is well paid and should have known what he was getting into when
he joined us; also, some of the players that have been brought in over the past
12 months are ‘his guys’ and so far they have not turned us into worldbeaters,
while disappointment at January window departures and arrivals should be
conditioned by the fact that Ezri Konsa was not sold (nor was Josh Magennis).
If he goes now Robinson will still deservedly carry the ‘failure’ tag with him.
If he is to stay, he has to demonstrate clearly that he is up for the task in
terms of enthusiasm and commitment (to Charlton, not the owner).
Ultimately whether
Robinson stays or goes is now very much secondary to the takeover, given recent
results and current form. We may yet pull off what would in the circumstances
be an entirely unexpected victory on Saturday, in which case the picture
changes once more. Quite possibly the players are well aware that Robinson has
come to the end of his time here – but that would be no excuse for playing with
indifference.
There is one issue
that still nags at me, one which I don’t think was fully resolved at the time
(early 2017). When Robinson joined us he talked of having been won over by the
vision and strategy that Duchatelet had for the club, most obviously the
emphasis on developing young players. It still seems to me entirely inappropriate
that when manager of MK Dons he managed to end up with a (small) shareholding
in the company of Dele Alli’s agent, which only came to light with that company
getting sued by the tax authorities (MK Dons said they did not know about the
holding). This may be something and nothing, but I’d still welcome some
reassurance that Robinson has – and has not had since joining us – any personal
financial interest in the young players developed at Charlton.
5 comments:
That's excellent. One quality Robinson has shown was his awareness of inclusivity, fans, players, club, one unit regardless of ownership. Was it genuine, who knows.
Now with the "people's careers are going down the pan" quote there is a different emphasis. I wonder if he genuinely means people's (plural) or just his. "We all knew (the fans except the troll) that "we have our back" after some good results was well too premature until the departure of the man. And that's what it has proved to be. If he couldn't see that it's best he's gone.
Time for an update please Richard - you know the bit you like, managing the relationship with the fans.
Thanks for the comments guys. I'd only add that I can't think of a more surreal situation in football than the club site (media watch) having an extensive list of the media reports covering Robinson's possible departure but not a word from the club, the owner or the other director.
It's like when a player doesn't want to play any more, do one then, we need people onboard for the rebuild.
We do indeed Si Jones. But we can't expect anyone for a rebuild to come in until the ownership situation is resolved.
Post a Comment