Sunday, 22 June 2008

Is It The Championship In Disguise?

I thought I was on a summer sabbatical. But I guess it still isn’t really summer; and one of the prerequisites for doing one of these things, as others are seldom reluctant to point out, is an inability to keep it shut for any length of time. So, here we go. What can we learn from Euro2008? There have to be some messages, given that the tournament itself is rapidly taking on the appearance of The Championship: no outstanding teams, competitive games but not of the highest quality, just about any team capable of winning on the day. I actually wanted a few weeks when I could forget about this sort of football.

It’s not because England aren’t there, or even attributable to the lamentable quality of the match analysis (with in my view some honourable exceptions), but I haven’t really warmed to Euro2008 (which is not to say I haven’t welcomed a ready-made excuse for slobbing out on the sofa watching hours of football or that I won’t miss it when it’s gone). People are generally critical of the last World Cup; but I found that a damn site more exciting. In Italy (then) there was a great side (I did choose them to win in a pre-tournament competition). Best goalkeeper in the world (Buffon), one of the best centre-backs marshalling a defence (Canavaro), an inspired defensive midfielder (Gattuso), and an ability to play 4-5-1 with a tall target man (Toni) because there was the necessary counterpart in a roving forward playing around him (Totti). The Italian team was not boring at all; it was inspired. And the tournament had a real classic (the Germany v Italy semi-final).

So far in Euro2008 only one game has held real interest from start to finish: the Holland v Russia upset. Others have provided drama, moments of excitement, great goals etc, but they have all fallen short, as have the teams (the only real quality so far has come from the referees, who have been outstanding). Nobody seems able to shoot from distance with the ball they are using, or to be able to get any dip for free kicks. No team seems able to defend while the ones that have provided the real entertainment (Holland and Portugal) failed once pressure was applied. Germany are in the semis thanks to a sneaky and cynical foul by Ballack, Russia are there because the Dutch underestimated them and thought they could stroll it, and Turkey are there because .... well god only knows the answer to that one.

Basically I don’t want Russia to win, given that such a success would be used to bolster an unwanted degree of nationalism in what is still a near-dictatorship. I don’t want Spain to win as the racism of their fans was (maybe still is) disgusting. I’d go for Italy, but the team is a shadow of what went before and would be unworthy winners. So I guess I’m going to join forces with a mate and belatedly support Turkey. Surely they can’t make it past Germany given the decimation of their team. Well, any chance they did have just went up in smoke anyway.

I’d like to think that there’s no future for a European national tournament (as opposed to the World Cup, which provides a delight of diversity and contrasting styles). The fact is that none of the national teams would make it past maybe the last eight of the Champions League. The best football is no longer played by national teams. This is all indicative of the (very welcome) drift towards near-irrelevance of national parliaments in Europe – provided of course that European federalism is accompanied by a strengthening of regional institutions. Maybe I’m just bitter at yet another phone-in on the European Union being hijacked by ardent and activist opponents of the entire concept. Just how they can present a ‘no’ vote in Ireland as a victory for democracy and national sovereignty is beyond me when the vote itself was heavily influenced by the electorate being inclined to vote against their domestic politicians.

Enough of the soapbox. What does it all mean for Charlton? Well, the team that reminded me most of us last season was France: disjointed, unable to get the best out of the best players or to find the right combination(s), lacking team spirit, and ultimately failing badly. I should add that I have no wish to suggest that Alan Pardew in any way reminds me of Domenech. Other than that both have of late been selecting two defensive central midfield players. In both cases there are excuses (the availability of alternatives), but please can it not be repeated next season. Message? Holland and Semedo: individually fine, even excellent; together insufficient.

Neither France nor Italy have been able to adapt to the loss of great players: Zidane for France (arguably Henry too), Totti and Canavaro for Italy. France were unable to come up with a new system that would get the best out of what are very good if disparate forwards. Starting a tournament with a front two who had never played together competitvely, then making changes for each of the next two games was just poor planning and management. Italy began against Holland with Toni on his own but nobody to play around him to provide the spark. Message? If the kids are to play a bigger role for us next season than last they need to be given the responsibility early – and the time to improve. Also, unless we sign a Totti, or Ambrose demonstrates he can play in the hole on a regular basis, it’s going to be 4-4-2 for us.

I think there’s less danger next season (compared to last) of us doing a Holland and failing to turn up against a ‘lesser’ team. Having seen off the last two World Cup finalists the Dutch thought they could get past Russia at half-pace. They started slowly and failed to score when the chances came their way. A team with more self-belief and better finishers than Russia would have really demolished them. As it was, one of Russia’s successes, highlighted by the analysts, was two attack-minded full backs. They were effective in pushing back the Dutch wide men and minimising their support for their forwards. Message? Yassin and Youga please, not Halford and Thatcher.

So, if we were most like France, with a smattering of Italy and Holland, and Euro2008 is The Championship in disguise, who were the rest? Well, Turkey are doing a passable imitation of Hull. It’s a little unfair on West Brom but they have to be Germany, ie probably the best team around. Greece were about as popular as Stoke, but obviously less successful; maybe they will resemble Stoke next season. Poland were the tournament’s Palace. Nobody wanted them there and nobody noticed that they were there. Romania were Scunthorpe or Colchester. Both worthy but ultimately not good enough – except when they played us. Sweden resembled Ipswich, while Austria and Switzerland were the tournament’s Coventry- basically pants.

6 comments:

charlton north-downs said...

Hi Blackheath didn't you just hate it when Charlton defeated some of the big teams and got about as much credit as a digestive biscuit. Charlton once went to Anfield(2003/4 I think)and put in a fantastic performance and won 1-0 MOTD -worst Liverpool performance for years. For me football is not about politics never will be, it should be about the best team winning, Russia just played with a freedom that was so refreshing and played a good Holland team off the park. Watching football is when I can escape even more so when watching Charlton.

Blackheath Addicted said...

You're right of course CND. We should ignore the politics. It's just that once France were exposed as bad in every department I was looking around to see who I wanted to win the tournament. Just like voting it was easier to identify who you don't want to win and work backwards.

I am disappointed that Italy lost last night, if only as a victory for them would have got right up the nose of Alan Shearer (he who was sent off, correctly, at The Valley). He kept saying 'there's only one team trying to win the game'. I don't think so. Italy's plan to win the game centred on defending in numbers and sneaking a goal from somewhere - rather than playing an open game and getting hammered. It very nearly worked.

Anonymous said...

My mother is Polish! How dare you suggest a general lack of interest in our presence. She dressed up for each game! We all did and had Kuchnia Polska.

Unlike other countries we managed to qualify!

I shall be monitoring the blog in the future for any suggestions of bias against our great state!

So much for the Spain and racism!

Lewisham Addick

Blackheath Addicted said...

LA, I apologise unreservedly, especially to your mother. I should have known better. And if I try to find a country that truly reflects the standing, values, tradition and prospects of Palace I will no doubt get a deserved rebuke from the one Charlton-supporting representative of Uzmogladeshistan.

Lungrot said...

The Portugal v Germany game reminded me of our home match to Burnley last season, when we were undone by two near identical free kicks taken from near the left touchline.
Both goals were easily headed in and involved terrible defending on our part, just like the Portugese defence.

Anonymous said...

BA you must be missing Charlton games because you are way off the mark. Champoinship football is crap full stop. I have not seen any silky skills from a recent Charlton player or from any of the visiting players-compare that to this years Euro-virtually every game has come up with some gems.

As for politics-at least the Irish have the ability to say no, the English bend over and take it up the a**e every year.

And as for slaging off the Polish, my mother is Polish and my dad irish so you are managing to insult my whole family!

Anymore of this and I will report you and your blog to the UK antirasism committee.