There
wasn’t exactly a mood of optimism ahead of the game, given the recent form of
us and them. And it’s not exactly laughs and cheers following it, as the
supporters’ lack of belief seemed to be echoed on the pitch. There was no
shortage of effort and commitment, just a feeling that we didn’t believe we
would score and a lack of conviction, of belief that this was a game we could
win. It was encapsulated in the first 30 minutes, as Derby offered nothing; we
controlled the play, dominated possession, but seemed to be happy to be in the
game, scared of what Derby might be able to do as and when they started to
play, and reluctant to try to turn dominance into a match-winning position. If
anything we ended up paying the price for that period, conceding an unfortunate
and undeserved goal but thereafter seldom looking as if we could get back on
level terms, let alone win.
With
Jackson unavailable, Sir Chris opted for a 4-5-1, with Green given a start on
the right, Stewart on the left, and Prichard playing in the hole behind Kermorgant.
Might not have seemed progressive playing at home, but we thought we were up
against a good side, certainly a confident one, and when the manager calls for
a siege mentality ahead of the game you aren’t exactly primed for an all-out
attacking formation.
We
can’t say the set-up really worked in that first half-hour, but with Stephens
winning tackles, Green involved, and Cousins tidying up behind we were on top,
not least because whatever weapons Derby may have were being kept in reserve.
You felt that at some moment they would show what they can do, but that didn’t
happen. Instead it was something of a phoney war, with us probing but not
really threatening – and them doing neither. There were good runs, a couple of
free kicks in decent positions (the first of which Green either overhit or
forced their keeper to tip over, depending on your interpretation, and the
second clearly underhit), and moments when something might have happened.
Kermorgant couldn’t make the most of one incident in the box, then didn’t get
enough on an effort from outside the box with their keeper out of position.
What
was missing was the invention to carve out a real chance, with Pitchard not
effective and Stewart this time flattering to deceive, looking for free-kicks
which never were and howling at the injustice of it all – in contrast to
Kermorgant, who was manhandled all afternoon only to see another weak referee fail
to provide any protection (more of that later). It wasn’t that the ref made
awful decisions, he just failed to see what was going on, the shoves, the
cynical fouls when Derby were out of position. Not awful, just weak and
inadequate (with no assistance from linesmen that pretended to see nothing and
said nothing).
The
ref was to play an important role in the moment that we feared might come.
After half an hour a challenge outside the box was a possible foul but the ref
allowed play to continue, only to bring things back for a free kick when the
move came to nothing. I actually think that’s fair, as long as it’s
consistently applied (more of that later). The shot from the free kick was
harmless but took a wicked deflection which left Alnwick stranded. Derby found
themselves 1-0 up in a game in which they had barely broken sweat.
4-5-1
is fine when you are on even terms or ahead, but when you fall behind the
drawbacks become quickly apparent. Derby saw out the remainder of the first
half by knocking it around and attempting very little. They didn’t have to. I
doubt they could believe their luck; certainly it was a body blow for us, one
which undermined our entire approach but also served to underline the fact that
we had failed to make our dominance in the first 30 minutes count.
We
needed to start the second half well and hopefully get back into things. And
soon into it Green played in Wilson overlapping. His cross was played in
towards Kermorgant, who was shoved out of the way by their defender. The ball
actually broke to Stephens (I think) around the edge of the box but he put the
shot just wide of the post. Now what was wrong with giving the penalty, just as
advantage had been played for their free kick? Clearly the ref hadn’t seen the
shove on Kermorgant, but it was right in line of sight for the linesman. To
nobody’s surprise, he indicated nothing.
In
a game of few chances it was another turning point. Thereafter Derby did
threaten a few times as we ran out of ideas, perhaps waiting for what seemed to
be an inevitable change of formation. It was a tough call for Powell at 0-1 as
an equaliser would have changed the entire picture, whereas a second goal for
them and subsequent changes would have been criticised for coming too late. And
that nearly happened as Derby did finally create something, with a well-worked
move ending with the ball squared to a guy inside the box in space, only for
his shot to come back off the bar. If that had gone in the mood would have
become truly gloomy.
The
changes did come, with Church and Harriott replacing Green and Pritchard, who
hadn’t been able to rise above nuisance value in a role which doesn’t play to
his strengths. The surprise was that Harriott didn’t seem to be operating wide
right but instead played more centrally. If anything that compressed the space,
with Derby packing that area and Harriott often finding himself running into a
swarm of defenders.
Our
second real moment of the game was to be the final turning point. After a set
piece Kermorgant looked up and curled the ball towards the far post where
Morrison rose. From a yard or two out it seemed he only had to get a good
connection on the ball and it was in. He didn’t manage to do so. That was to be
the final opportunity, given that the referee was never going to give
Kermorgant anything, even when he was grabbed around the neck in the box. When
Kermit finally was awarded a free kick, in a nothing position, he presumably
said something to the ref to pick up a yellow. Whatever he said, in French or
English, was presumably appropriate.
The
final, desperate, change saw Sordell come on for Wilson. Don’t ask me what the
formation was after that, but it didn’t matter as shortly after Derby scored a
second. A poor pass put Morrison under pressure in the absence of Wilson and
his clearance only found one of their guys, who did something and the ball
ended up in our net. It really didn’t matter as this was another home game in
which the chances of us scoring were small indeed.
A
word for our visitors? I seemed to have upset some Leeds fans recently when I
labelled them scum for the antics of their players on the pitch, the sustained
cynicism, professionalism if you like. Fouls to break up play, dives, rolling
around in agony, mixed with the sort of shoves that these days you see at every
set piece in the Premiership. The word was probably a bit emotive, born out of
frustration after we’d lost a game we shouldn’t have. Derby weren’t as bad, but
not by much; and I don’t know what the term is for one notch above (neither am
I going to suggest that we should have won today; to do that you have to create
more). The common denominator is weak refs who fail to see – or are happy to
ignore – what is going on. As long as we have such officials, I guess these
tactics will continue to be embraced by some teams.
We’re
left with another dispiriting home defeat. What was also worrying was signs of
bickering on the pitch at the death. The dressing room is presumably an unhappy
place at the moment, for good reason (and with the takeover seemingly having
fallen through, ending thoughts for now at least of January purchases, the fans
aren’t exactly happy either). There’s work to be done to improve confidence and
belief as we now have a run of fixtures which need to produce points.
Player
Ratings:
Alnwick
– 7/10. No chance with either goal and not a great deal to do otherwise.
Wilson
– 7/10. Overlapped well enough, no defensive errors.
Wiggins
– 7/10. Capable, and what I liked was his efforts to get forward when the chips
were down.
Morrison
– 7/10. The defence wasn’t the problem today; we conceded a deflected free-kick
and a goal which didn’t matter when we had made changes that left us short at
the back. And I’m not going to dock him a point for not converting that cross,
even though I can’t help thinking he should have done.
Dervite
– 7/10. Same for him.
Green
– 6/10. Was involved and put in some decent crosses (even though I think he
didn’t get the two first-half free kicks right), but no decisive contribution.
Cousins
– 6/10. Once again neat and tidy, provided effective cover in front of the
defence, but no more.
Stephens
– 7/10. His robust tackling was a factor in our domination of the first 30
minutes, but he too didn’t make a decisive contribution – and put the shot wide
early in the second half.
Stewart
– 5/10. He got rave reviews from the Yeovil game and I’m a fan of his, as he
makes things happen. But today he was anonymous when we needed a match-winner.
Seemed miffed at not getting first-half free-kicks and complaining instead of
getting on with things.
Pritchard
– 5/10. Very tough for him today, the game passed him by as he was asked to do
a job that doesn’t seem to suit him.
Kermorgant
– 6/10. Things didn’t run for Kermit today. Tempted to give him an extra mark
for whatever he called the ref; on that scale I would have seen red.
Subs
– Church (5/10; failed to have an impact when he came on); Harriott (5/10; ran
into cul de sacs, presumably having been told not to play out wide); Sordell (no
mark as he was again only on when the game was up, but there do seem to be
concerns about his attitude).
No comments:
Post a Comment