I’m
a simple soul; itt doesn’t take much to make me happy. Recently a hot dog from
a portable BBQ in -15 degrees in the middle of Icelandic mountains was pretty
good; but it doesn’t come close to a last-gasp Johnnie Jackson header to give
us a win that could prove utterly uplifting. It was a match which before the
start we would have been to take a point from and which had 0-0 written all
over it, after we hit both posts in the same move in the first half and QPR
failed to hit the target with their only decent created moment (we’ll come to
their other moment later). But in the final 10 minutes we wanted it more than
them and that ended up counting, with a couple of substitutions giving us fresh
legs and momentum.
Just
as the possession stats in the home game against Birmingham meant nothing, so
today the fact that (according to the BBC) QPR had 66% possession was
irrelevant. Far more important was their 0 for attempts on target. They didn’t
come to terms with the pitch and looked like an outfit happy to give the ball
to someone and expect them to do something; clearly they have players capable
of making things happen, but we set up with the two banks of four in front of
them and basically kept their opportunities to a minimum. Thuram-Ulien didn’t
have an actual shot to save all game. That we won it was testimony to qualities
that I feared might desert us with all the recent changes: heart and
determination.
We
began with a basic 4-4-2, with Thuram-Ulien retained in goal despite Hamer
being fit (and on the bench), Wiggins returning, Wilson as the other full-back,
and Dervite partnering Morrison in central defence. The experiment of Cousins
wide right was correctly ditched and instead he and Poyet were the central
pair, with Jackson widish left and Green getting a start on the right, while
Church came back to partner Gucci up front. No place for Peter the Pole on the
bench, while Ajdarevic was also among the subs. The two things that struck me
about the team were first, the contrast now in terms of age/experience in central
midfield compared with the start of the season, when the fear was how well Dad’s
Army would hold up; and second, despite all the Duchatelet signings, only two
were on the pitch (please don’t tell me that swapping Kermorgant, Stephens and
Alnwick for Gucci and Thuram-Ulien has made us stronger, but we leave that for
another day). Also on the bench was recent addition Tudguy.
The
first half (in reality the entire game) wasn’t one to delight the neutral, with
threats in either final third few and far between. A very cagy opening period
set the tone, with us generally sitting back as Poyet and Cousins provided an
effective shield in front of the defence but with Gucci and Church having no chance in
the air against their centre-backs and our set-up pretty much leaving them to
chase lost causes. QPR had a couple of shots from outside the box, but for at
least one the pitch did its job with a good bobble before it arrived. Both went
harmlessly wide. The only moment of real drama was at their end and should have
seen us take the lead. Wiggins and Jackson resumed their combination down the
left and it resulted in a decent ball to the far post. Green controlled it and
laid it back for Cousins, whose shot beat Green (the other one) but came back
off the post. It seemed like a tap-in for Church (I think, others said Gucci)
with the rebound but instead the effort came back off the other post. Wasn’t a
gimmee but should have been converted.
At
the break we were nevertheless reasonably content, given our pre-match
ambitions. The defence was operating well and QPR hadn’t stretched us – with the
exception of one outstanding run by their centre-back, who took the ball all
the way into the box before seeing the opportunity to throw himself to the
ground in a truly laughable fashion. Play continued for a few minutes after,
but just why the ref didn’t give him a yellow card amazed me. Perhaps he didn’t
feel that his fall was worthy of being called a dive.
QPR
came out for the second half with a bit more intent, presumably after a bit of
a rollocking, and looked threatening for a while. They did carve out one decent
chance, with their guy down the left pulling it back to someone who really
should have put it away but he sliced it horribly wide. Perhaps the pitch came
to our rescue again. We were creating nothing but hanging in and the game
increasingly looked like ‘who scores first wins’ (just like the youth cup match
last night).
Changes
were made by them, with it notable that Doyle was replaced, having got nothing
out of Morrison and Dervite. And around that time there was the moment when we
might have gifted them the game. It was a poor back pass, difficult for
Thuram-Ulien to deal with, but it very nearly became a disaster as his effort
to control is saw their forward nick it from him. Fortunately he ran out of
space and the ball went over the line before he could tuck it into the net or
pull it back for someone else to do that.
Green
and Gucci were replaced by Ajdarevic and Tudgay and the changes did make a
difference. Tudgay knows his way around and he was a good deal more adept at
holding the ball against bigger opponents, while Ajdarevic gave us more than we
had before in their half. A rare passing move around their box ended with
Jackson shooting wide. Harriott came on for Church, who as usual had worked his
socks off, to provide another possibility, but with the clock running down I
don’t think anyone expected the deadlock to be broken. Certainly QPR didn’t and
as they seemed to settle for the point – after their guy had fluffed a chance
through poor control, allowing Thuram-Ulien to grab the ball - we managed to
take the initiative. Going into stoppage time Ajdarevic tried a curler from
outside the box that Green (the other one) did well to turn around the post for
a corner.
And
what a corner it was. Curled to the far post by Ajdarevic (rather than behind
the goal-line like the previous one by Jackson) and in came the skipper to get
his head on the ball. From where I sit I thought it was probably into the
side-netting, but glory be it was squeezed into the net. The ploy of assuming
that Green (the other one) can’t deal with crosses did finally pay off. I don’t
know if the entire Valley erupted, but I did.
All
that was left was to see out the final minute or so; and then for Sir Chris to
emerge to enjoy the plaudits with the players. On the balance of play, over 90
minutes, QPR will undoubtedly be gutted to leave with nothing. But that telling
statistic again: no efforts on target. We (apparently) had only three, but two
that were ‘off target’ came back off the woodwork and we had the one that
counted.
What
counted most for me wasn’t the win (don’t get me wrong, it’s made me very
happy), but the attitude on the pitch. Exemplary. If we keep that going we will
stay up.
Player
Ratings:
Thuram-Ulien:
5/10. What mark do you give a keeper who hasn’t had a shot to save or dangerous
crosses to deal with? His dodgy moment with the (admittedly poor) back pass
nearly cost us the game.
Wilson:
8/10. The guy keeps doing what we ask him to do. Wasn’t perfect but against
decent opposition put in a performance.
Wiggins:
8/10. Composed at the back and combined well with Jackson going forward. Just a
class act, so glad he’s signed a new contract.
Morrison:
9/10. Outstanding.
Dervite:
9/10. Equally impressive, the pair of them gave their front two no
opportunities in open play.
Green:
6/10. Struggled to make a real impact down the flanks and didn’t get in the
crosses he was picked to do; but did set up Cousins well for the shot that came
back off the post.
Cousins:
8/10. Pairing him with Poyet in central midfield was asking a lot of both of
them and neither disappointed. As a pairing in other games we might not get a
great deal going forward, but today they were just right in protecting the
defence.
Poyet:
8/10. Another excellent display. Some misplaced passes, but reads the game well
and consequently often appears at the right moment to break up the opposition’s
play.
Jackson:
8/10. Had to get the extra mark for the goal, as it meant so much. Otherwise
fair enough, but his knack of scoring at key moments, in a team which is
struggling for goals, is still key.
Church:
6/10. It was a tough ask for the front two, neither being target men and likely
to be outmuscled by their central defenders. If it was him who didn’t convert
the rebound off the post ….
Gucci:
5/10. Looks like he’s struggling to adjust to what’s needed at this level.
Comfortably contained by their defence.
Subs: Tudgay (7/10 – made a difference when he came
on by being a better outlet than Gucci); Ajdarevic (8/10 – I was more critical
than others of his performance against Birmingham, but there’s no question he
has ability and he too made a positive difference when he came on); Harriott (7/10
– not on for long but did cause them a problem or two).
I think your player assessment and scoring is spot on. The defence were tremendously good today, not just strong, but consistently well organised.
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the first half I thought we had defended well, but were short in three areas that looked like the missing Stephens, Alnwick and Kermo.
Its the first time that I've seen the new players, and only Astrit looked good. Gucci has some skill, but didn't show the pace or the strength for the Championship. If "Polish Pete" can't make it into the team I wonder quite what we have bought, perhaps, like Koc, he is one to deveelop for next season.
Nick
ReplyDeleteThough Jackson was MOTM by a mile - even before the goal, Lung busting runs into the box and block-tackles on the edge of his own box.
Thanks for the comments guys. I think it makes a big difference for Jackson when he's playing left side of midfield to be in tandem with Wiggins as they know each other's play well enough, cover well.
ReplyDeletePoyet's display was the highpoint for me. His reading of the game and tenacity , like the tackle for JJ's goal. This was a display of an experienced player not of a novice.
ReplyDeleteAstrit has class and drive and will be far better than Stephens.
Poyet has indeed been very impressive in the two games I've seen him play. As was highlighted elsewhere, his tackle which ended up with the corner was reminiscent of the crunching one at Wembley which led to our fourth.
ReplyDeleteThe only downside of having a central pairing of Cousins and Poyet seems to be not much drive going forward, which means compensating in other ways. Astrit undoubtedly has something, but I think he's a different type of player than Stephens. Think he might be best with a roving role, either in the hole or from out wide. Up to us to get the best out of him and develop a formation that plays to our strengths.
This normally takes a bit of time, but we've got games coming thick and fast, so lots of work to do. Just seems all more possible after Saturday.