Can’t
go into this weekend without something a bit more upbeat than the last post. There
has to be some fun, otherwise what’s the point? So come Sunday morning, at some
ungodly hour, I’ll be doing the trip up to Sheffield. It’s one I’m used to,
having spent three years-plus in the city; but to the best of my knowledge I’ve
never seen us compete in an FA Cup quarter-final (I missed Operation Riverside,
and the one against Bolton; if there was another I’ve forgotten it). One game
away from a Wembley FA Cup semi-final, the first in my lifetime, to be then one
game away from almost certain European football at The Valley next season.
Well, even I still have to dream sometimes.
There’s
not much point speculating about the team and the formation, given fitness
doubts. Suffice to say that if all are fit and fresh enough (with the start of
the fixture glut this weekend) the team that takes the pitch would be expected
to include Hamer, Wilson, Wiggins, Morrison, Jackson, Cousins and Poyet. Add to
that bunch Church, given his current cup record, and Wood or Dervite (both of
course if Morrison isn’t available) and there’s only two other places.
Presumably a second forward would be one of Sordell, Tudgay or Ghoochannejhad
(with the other two on the bench, unless Peter the Pole gets a berth) and the
other midfield starting slot one from Green, Harriott or Ajdarevic (unless
Wilson is moved further forward).
I’d
guess it will be a case, as against QPR, of putting out the two banks of four,
to put the emphasis on keeping things tight. The fact that Sheff Utd are in
League One is pretty irrelevant for this game, especially given their current
form. Having the hoodoo sign over Sheffield, when it comes to the big games,
should work to our advantage (I’ m drawing a veil over my last trip to Bramall
Lane, when we put in a spineless performance in the Premiership relegation
season and lost in the last minute); but who scores first may well be the key
to the game.
It
was pleasing to see that BBC ‘football expert’ Mark Lawrenson has gone for a
1-0 win for Sheffield. Superb footballer but a lazy pundit. It sticks in my
mind that a few years back Rangers were due to play Lyon in the Champions
League group stage, having won in Lyon earlier in the season. When asked if he
thought Rangers would win he said ‘why not? They won in Lyon’. I have a passing
interest in Lyon, due to my French partner Suzanne, and knew that after a very
poor start to the season Lyon were by then on a roll. I would have expected an ‘expert’
to have taken a few minutes to check, perhaps even just to be aware because of
what you get paid for. Lyon won the game. His ‘opponent’ this weekend in the
forecasting game, Bastille drummer Chris ‘Woody’ Wood, is quoted on the BBC
site as saying “I’m not too bad at guessing scores” and has gone for 3-2 to us.
I’ll settle for that (but might prefer a 0 for them).
Back
to the other matters (back to negativity?). I did read in full the report on
the meeting between Katrien Meire, Richard Murray and VIP season ticket
holders and had a less positive interpretation than others. It did provide some insight into some of the January ins and outs,
without papering over the fact that poor decisions were made and unwanted moves
occurred largely because of the uncertainty surrounding the club (including Sir
Chris’ position). In other circumstances this would be forgivable, even
understandable for a guy who’d only just bought the club. In our situation, the
absence of clarity left people to draw their own conclusions and make their own
plans – and who can blame them? Neither did what was said add much to the
prospective balance in the years ahead between what’s good for Charlton per se
and what’s good for the Duchatelet network. Only time will tell on that front.
Where
Miere fell down in my view was the (reported) answer to the question: ‘Is it
true that M. Duchatelet gains GBP4m on the price of the club if it is
relegated. Isn’t this a perverse incentive?’ I’d agree that the question wasn’t
perhaps well phrased, giving the implication that he might want us to go down.
Even I have never believed that (and thought that a clause to cover the eventuality
was entirely sensible). But the (reported) answer was: “It is an insult to
suggest that RD would consider relegation. Even if such a clause exists,
failure is not an option for him”. Sorry, but that’s just silly. If such a
clause exists, why would it if RD ‘doesn’t do failure’? RD failed (to date)
with his political career, or was that someone else’s fault? A positive
attitude is to be commended, perhaps even essential in any walk of life. But
people who haven’t experienced failure (in whatever form, relative to
expectations) are not to be trusted. They haven’t learnt from setbacks; and
they won’t know how to avoid failure when it stares them in the face.
Let’s
just hope that Miere’s answer was a bit tongue in cheek and an off-the-cuff
response to a clumsy question. And yes, let’s hope she’s swinging from a
crossbar on Sunday.
As
for the (potential) flaws in the European network approach to get around fair
play rules, I remain sceptical. The week has seen a string of Championship
clubs unveil numbers (for losses and debts outstanding) that at first sight appear
unsustainable, even lunacy relative to turnover. But so what? The distortion in
Championship clubs’ finances comes from the gulf between this division and the
Premiership and unless and until that is addressed (and there’s no obvious
incentive for it to be) the pull of a GBP120m (and rising) boost from getting
promotion won’t be circumvented.
Two
recent comments to posts (mine and others) stood out for me. One guy commented
that he (or she) doubted it was possible to get promoted from the Championship from
a breakeven financial position. I’d go further and suggest that it’s very
difficult to avoid getting relegated from that position; perhaps it will be
possible over time. The other was along the lines of any good business needs to
be profitable (or at least break even). It doesn’t. It’s all about the
sustainability of the financing. Championship clubs have more in common with
start-ups than mature companies, given that lure of the Premiership.
So,
all we need to do tomorrow is sit back and cheer for Notts Forest, Derby,
Huddersfield, and even Sheff Wed. Then once Sunday is over, and the fixture
list is rejigged to accommodate Wembley, it’s back to the calendar to try to
plan ahead. That’s not my strong point (Suzanne is the planning department in
our relationship). Months ago I booked a trip to Lyon, sacrificing the trip to
our near neighbours. I didn’t know then that I’d also be passing up watching
Kermorgant play against us. For what it’s worth, I’m that dumb that I used a
season ticket voucher for the game to get Suzanne a ticket as she was due in
London that weekend, before realising that the game was almost certain to be
postponed (Bournemouth only needed to beat Burton). Planning? I can just about
manage the weekend, with luck.
2 comments:
The Man U QF is the one your missing BA
Blimey. I thought planning was my weak point CA but research is running a close second. I was there too, singing along to 'things can only get better' at half-time.
Post a Comment