It’s impossible to
lose a game to a stoppage-time goal and not feel hard done by. But some go your
way and some don’t. Nobody would deny that a draw would have been a fair result
on the balance of play and chances created, with really nothing to choose
between the two sides in a decent game. Fact is the game is about putting the round white thing
into the net and today two teams spent 94 minutes failing to do that, despite
creating enough possibilities (had to check the BBC stats and according to them
we had 21 attempts and five on target, Ipswich 19 and six respectively; at the end
of the day only one mattered). If it had been us taking the points in stoppage
time by actually scoring Ipswich could have had no complaints; by the same
token neither can we (especially as we’ve won games this season by scoring the
only goal late on).
With Henderson and Wiggins
still unavailable, the defence picked itself. But whereas we started with a
4-5-1 against Millwall including Buyens, his absence was countered by bringing
in Harriott to partner Vetokele up front in a 4-4-2, with Jackson and Coquelin
in central midfield and Cousins and Gudmundsson either side of them. The plan
seemed to be to exploit Harriott’s pace to get in behind them. Like so much
through the game, for both sides, it nearly worked.
I remember the game
at The Valley against Ipswich last season, when they flew out of the traps,
scored early, and effectively had the game won before we started. Almost a
repeat this time around as a corner in the first minute found two Ipswich players
effectively unmarked, only for them to get in each other’s way, resulting in a
tame header wide. But in a decidedly open start we responded with a move ending
with Gudmundsson being played in well but stretching to get the shot away and
the ball flying over the bar. Their front two were causing problems in the
early stages, winning more than their fair share of aerial challenges (that
McCarthy influence as they made sure with shoves and pulls if they weren’t
going to win the ball against Bikey-Amougou and Ben Haim there would be enough
interference to ensure no decisive clearance), while Solly had his hands full
with the experienced Hunt, a task he was to prove well up to. Equally the ploy
of using Harriott was causing them problems, especially when Vetokele was able
to find him with some deft touches into space to exploit his pace.
I don’t take notes
and listing each move and shot is beyond me. Suffice to say both teams through
the first half continued to exchange almost decisive blows. A fierce shot from
Solly was parried, as were efforts from Harriott and Gudmundsson, while a
superb run from Coquelin into the box was well spotted only for their keeper to
smother the effort from close range. At the other end Pope was required to make
saves of a higher standard than those against Millwall to keep them out, while
a couple of free kicks whipped in by Hunt only needed someone to get on the end
of them.
At the break, for all
the effort it was scoreless and the game was still there for either side to
win. They had the edge when it came to set pieces, while a couple of tall and
effective forwards meant they were happy enough to play it longer. We had
crafted decent openings and had enough attempts on goal and as against Millwall
seemed to have the weapons to possibly win the game, with Cousins and
Gudmundsson getting joy down the flanks, Vetokele always a threat, and Harriott
having the pace to trouble them. But as against Millwall we hadn’t scored.
The early stages of
the first half were rather scrapier than before, with both sides giving away
possession rather too cheaply. But after a while we settled into the same sort
of pattern. Chances came and went at both ends, more frustratingly for us than
them. A ball played across their box was fed on to Gudmundsson in space on the
right. He chose not to shoot first time and cut inside onto his left foot, only
for a defender to get a block in, and finally when one seemed to fall to
Vetokele he was unable to get his shot away. They had a fierce drive from a
full-back that flashed wide, plus a free-kick which proved dangerous as the ref
failed to spot a blatant shove on Jackson who was all set to clear. I remember
remarking with about 20 minutes left that it increasingly looked as though both
teams could play until midnight, even allowing for the horribly early start,
and not score.
The time for changes
approached and as they rejigged we brought on Wilson for Jackson, with Cousins
switching inside and Gudmundsson moving from the right to the left side. And
with about five minutes left Tucudean came on for Harriott to provide a
different sort of threat, although in truth it worked against us as we seemed
unable to change the approach to different personnel and abilities. As the
clock ticked down it did start to look as though if anyone was going to pinch
it the odds were shifting to Ipswich.
Into five minutes of
stoppage time and – after the curious decision to bring on Bulot (for
Gudmundsson) for a full couple of minutes - the chance for them that we had
feared arose, with their guy seemingly in on goal to shoot only for
Bikey-Amougou to get in what at the time seemed to be a point-saving challenge.
Then Bikey climbed to nod the ball into touch only to collide with their guy,
who seemed to take a bad knock in the face. But instead of him being taken off,
their trainer produced a spare shirt from his back pocket and after the break
he was waved back on, we lost the ball, he ran onto it inside the box and shot
into the net. A bit more crimson, or no spare shirt, and he wouldn’t have been
on the pitch. There was barely time to restart and it was all over.
There’s no point
dwelling on it. We deserved a point, could easily have taken all three, but
lost, for an obvious reason. Today Gudmundsson, Harriott, Cousins, Vetokele,
even Solly, failed to ensure that they found the back of the net. Nothing to be
done about it other than to work against not scoring becoming a mental block.
If we create as many chances in each game we play we will win more than we
lose.
Player Ratings:
Pope – 8/10. A few
very good saves, no chance with the goal.
Solly – 8/10.
Excellent game, saw off Hunt, got forward to good effect, all very good.
Fox – 7/10. Also pretty
decent, more of a presence going forward sometimes.
Bikey-Amougou – 7/10.
Gets an extra mark for the challenge that seemed at the time to have preserved
our point; otherwise against a troublesome front two wasn’t entirely
comfortable.
Ben Haim – 6/10. They
did have more chances than we’re used to seeing against us, perhaps not as
assured as we’ve come to expect.
Gudmundsson – 6/10.
Excellent work except for converting the chances that came his way, of which
there were a few.
Jackson – 6/10.
Generally effective without standing out, really neither side controlled
midfield.
Coquelin – 7/10.
Decent game, almost made the breakthrough with an excellent run into the box
only for the effort to be smothered.
Cousins – 7/10. Also
decent, provided an outlet, worked hard as ever.
Vetokele – 7/10. Some
excellent touches to play in Harriott, but for once when the good chance came
his way in the second half failed to get the shot away.
Harriott – 7/10. Thought
he had his best game as a second forward that I’ve seen. Couple of decent
shots, caused them problems. But as with everyone else not the goal we craved.
Subs: Wilson (6/10 – not much time to impact on the
game and if anything we tailed off towards the finish); Tucudean (6/10 – no impact
when he came on and that contributed to our uninspiring finish); Bulot (no
mark, just why bring on a player you hope will do something going forward with
just a couple of minutes left?).
No comments:
Post a Comment