This
was going to be a pretty easy - if depressing - match report to write at
half-time, but what to make of it now that it's over? Perhaps the appropriate
cliche is that goals change games. As we moved towards the break it was a case
of for crying out loud if we can get somehow back in only one down when it
could so easily have been more at least there's a chance of regrouping, and we
let in another. At the start of the second a third for Norwich and complete
embarrassment would have been on the cards, but you just never know; one back and
the game changes. We get one back, somehow we draw level, and Norwich are left
shaking their heads in disbelief, having slipped too far into the comfort zone
and risking throwing away points that were theirs for the taking. But we didn't
have it in us to go on and win the game (perhaps if we'd been attacking the
Covered End in the second half there would have been that extra momentum), or
to see it out, and ended up coughing up another chance for their replacement
forward to nod home.
Perhaps
stick to the facts as I remember them and see if it makes sense at the end. We
lined up with a return to the assumed first-choice defence, with Bikey-Amougou
and Wiggins returning. Jackson was fit enough to start alongside Buyens in
central midfield, with Cousins and Berg Gudmundsson either side, with the
returning Bulot given a rare start to play sort of in the hole/sort of up front
with Vetokele, with Watt dropping back to the bench and Church, having started
on Saturday, left out of the picture. It meant five changes from the Saturday
line-up and a formation which, with only one outright forward, put something of
an emphasis on not conceding first.
We
were bright enough in the opening stages without looking threatening, but
before long Norwich got into their stride and began to control possession and
alarming gaps at the back started to appear. We had a warning when a ball
across from their right side suddenly saw Solly outnumbered four-to-one, only for
the opportunity to be squandered. That proved to be only a temporary reprieve
as after about 15 minutes Solly was guilty of getting caught in possession
going forward. We were caught out of position and a ball squared to a guy
unmarked inside the area was slotted home. All rather too easy after the
initial error.
The
following 25 minutes were a sorry tale of us increasingly unable to retain
possession or to get anything moving going forward, with Bulot providing no
meaningful support for Vetokele, and Norwich looking more than capable of
adding to their lead. There was one moment of promise when Igor seemed to have
timed a run well and was picked out in space to bear down on goal, only for the
linesman to flag him offside. I'd have to see it again to be sure, but I'd put
money on it being a poor decision as it wasn't Vetokele in an offside position.
That aside, we failed to trouble their defence and again, the hope was that
Norwich wouldn't put the game to bed before half-time. They continued to threaten
but we were just about holding on, albeit with the mood ever more restless. But
then more uncertainty on the ball in the middle of the park and this time their
guy was sent through with only Dmitrovic to beat and with the ball sitting up
nicely for him he chipped the keeper to give them a cushion and to spark
understandable dissent from the crowd.
Any
number of changes might have been made at the break, but Luzon settled on just
the one, taking off the ineffective Bulot for Watt. It didn't make an immediate
difference, as Norwich began the second half pretty much still in control and
more likely to add to their lead than be pegged back. Who knows what would have
happened if they had scored a third, but they were so comfortable that they did
relax and probably became just a tad over-confident.
Watt
at least gave them something to think about by on his own dancing through three
or four before being dispossessed; he had to try his luck as nobody in a red
shirt was getting close to him. Perhaps spurred on by that, amazingly with our
first serious threat we were back in it. Vetokele played in Watt to run through
and he calmly stroked the ball past the keeper. Quite simple, not rocket
science, but decent movement and the right pass played, followed by a good
finish.
Encouragement
at least and perhaps the promise of more as another attacking substitution was
made. Jackson, who had provided a damn site more metal through the game than
Buyens but was perhaps going to struggle to last the full game, came off and
Harriott came on, to play on the wing as Cousins moved inside. And glory be it
was only another few minutes and we were level. This time, having won
possession in the middle of the park, good choices were again made as Cousins
and Harriott combined and when the ball was squared Igor connected. For a
moment from the East Stand it seemed it might not have gone in, but seems the
ball rebounded from the stantion and all was well. Two forwards converting
decent chances, two guys obviously in need of a goal.
Still
another 20 minutes or so to go and now Norwich have to go out and win again a
game that for so long had been in their pocket. To be fair to them, they
steadied the ship, made a change up front to bring on Jerome to give them more
of a physical presence in our box, and we seemed caught between going for a
truly amazing victory and trying to hold what we had. Perhaps surprisingly, as
the game entered the final 10 minutes, we didn't make use of a third possible
change, just to get on another pair of fresh legs. Instead Norwich had moments
from set pieces, with Dmitrovic not always strong when punching clear or attempting
to catch high balls, a dreadful appeal for a penalty rightly rejected (but not
punished with an appropriate yellow), and then scored another simple goal.
Decent move down their left, ball into the box, Jerome heads home without
either of our central defenders getting close to it.
We
had five minutes of stoppage time but we failed to muster another serious
attempt on their goal in what remained. Most games that have five goals and
only one between them can be described as thrillers, but this one wasn't. Through
the entire game I doubt that anyone there thought other than that Norwich were
the better team, or at the finish that we were in any way robbed. The surprise
was that we got back into it as two well-worked chances were both taken, by two
players who did emerge with credit. To then lose was in a way cruel, but given
the way we had failed to protect the back four and the way that through the
game that back four had failed to prevent chances it was hardly robbery.
When
the dust settles we are left with just the facts: another defeat, a team that
doesn't really know how to play together, a disparate group of players low on
confidence and with apparently variable motivation, and time running out to
turn things around as we edge closer to a relegation spot. We avoided
humiliation but came close. We lost because we conceded three and, but for
wasteful finishing on their part and complacency, it could have been more. Just
who and where to lay the blame isn't so easy as it smacked of a collective
failure; undoubtedly some players had awful games, some just made mistakes. It
needs sorting and quickly.
I do agree frustratingly with one of Guy's post match comments, "we have some quality players". If the defence stopped conceding so many, possibly by playing Gomez in front of it. You have to think those two strikers IV and TW played together from the start may get the goals needed. FK RD COYR.
ReplyDeleteGood blog!
ReplyDeleteI think we need a new spine: Gomez, Cousins and Watt.
Bring on Saturday!
Jackson came off before the first goal, not after it. Harriot's positive running made a huge difference, and then we started playing football. Sorry Johnnie but we are too slow and indecisive with you on the pitch these days.
ReplyDeleteGood positive posts with solutions as to what to do and how tactics make a change from all the negativity you read on other sites, well done. I think he should just go for it against Brentford and use Watt and Vetekole from the start.
ReplyDeleteThe negativity is unfortunate for everybody and I believe those who post it don't want to have to do so. They would rather be pleased with the owner. When posting about the clubs direction is when we get most of it. We all want the team to do well. Critic of RD and first Anonymous poster above. That's why I say F**k RD. COYR. This isn't disloyal.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments guys, usual apologies about the factual errors (I don't take notes, write pretty much from memory - and to be honest really wasn't sure how our second goal went in).
ReplyDeleteRe Jackson, I'd say we need him on the pitch to lead, for me Buyens was the weak link in that partnership last night.
And it just so happens I've penned my thoughts on what we do for Saturday!
The issue is Luzon's tactical naiveity; it was Hoolahan that made the game safe for Norwich - he ran the show once we had levelled. Luzon did nothing to counter him (and has probably never heard of him!). The Watt/Igor front line has been begging to start, yet never has - will he do so on Saturday? Probably not for some obscure reason (or his propensity to rotate...). We are going in one direction - down.
ReplyDeletePedro45
Well it was all pretty constructive apart from the anon above Blackheath Addick and it makes a refreshing change to read these purposeful posts, but well done that anon, you had to go and spoil it just like the rest of the boo boys and their depressing drivel.
ReplyDeleteStill don't get it do you Ben. I never have or would never boo the team but I still hate RD and the direction he's taking us in. The opposition to him represents a variety of different people opinions and behaviours. Some unaccetable the same as the support. You on one hand are applauding this site where Blackheath Addict and many others have been very critical of RD in the past because he and they care about our club.
ReplyDeleteI't not that simple son, have a think about it.
F**k RD COYR