There
have been many splendid books written on and around our club, from the
reference works (to which we are often indebted in the rush to scribble
something) to the accounts and biographies of former players. And they
continue, with Steve Bridge's 'Charlton Athletic In Pictures 1975-2015' (and
now £10 goes to CARD for each additional copy sold). But I have heard that
another of more questionable merit is in the pipeline. It's working title is apparently
'The True History of Charlton Athletic' and is set to form the third tomb of
incomparable wisdom from our owner. I am led to believe that the contents will
surprise many Addicks (and football historians) and will correct many
misunderstandings about the club.
The
book sheds light on the uncertain details of the formation of Charlton Athletic,
with the claim that it was in fact the work of extraterrestrials, who set in
motion the whole thing safe in the knowledge that one day there would be another
coming, of one much greater than them, to save the world of football from its
sins and to show us all the true path. The book reveals that contrary to
popular belief, Sam Bartram never actually played for Charlton (too old),
Derek Hales came through the Charlton youth ranks, Curbishley was Belgian, Sir
Chris was "certainly wrong" if he said he was told who he should pick
to play, and Yann Kermorgant was a player who "wanted to leave"
Charlton.
In
all seriousness, these latest comments from Duchatelet in the SLP interview are
beneath contempt - unless he really is so self-deluded to actually believe that
them (if so, he must be the only person in any way connected with Charlton that
does). It seems quite apparent at whose knee Ms Meire learnt how to pretend that
black is white with a straight face. We've seen Powell's recent comments
regarding being told who to pick. For the record here are some excerpts from an
interview with Kermorgant in the SLP back in February 2014. 'Yann goes on to
explain in detail how the club offered no form of negotiation with regard to
agreeing personal terms, how the club quickly accepted a bid from Bournemouth
and allowed him to talk to them, and how on the Thursday evening he was still
trying to negotiate a stay with the club. Despite Katrien Meire telling him
earlier the club still wanted to keep him, according to Yann she came back
later that evening and said after speaking with the owner that he wanted to
sell him'. Kermorgant is then quoted as saying "Charlton wanted to show
people they had tried to do something when in reality they had done nothing
special".
Just
disgruntled ex-employees of course, just as so many of us will be getting
labelled as disgruntled ex-supporters - except that we're not going anywhere
and, as the poster says, will be around when you have gone, whatever state the
club is in. In the interim, let's not allow deliberate attempts to rewrite
history, or at least to try to muddy the waters with some, be viewed as
anything other than (more) lies. If there is some comfort to be taken, it's
that we have no good reason to believe Duchatelet when he says he is not
prepared to sell the club. Why should we assume he is telling the truth over
this when he is so obviously content to lie on other matters?
On
a lighter note, would anyone like an update on a football club working well
within the community and enjoying a good season? I'm sure that during recent
months everyone has been doing their own checking up on France's CFA Groupe B
to see how Lyon Duchere have been getting on. But in case not, after an indifferent
season last time around - when they spent most of the campaign in the lower
reaches of their regional division but came through it unscathed (ie they
didn't get relegated) - this season have been on a splendid run pretty much
from day one.
In
the 16-team (ie 30-game) league after 18 matches La Duch have recorded 10 wins,
seven draws, and a solitary defeat, scoring 26 and conceding 13. There's only
one fly in the ointment: the fact that Grenoble have done even better: played
19, won 13, drawn four and lost two. Both teams stuttered in the latest round,
with Duchere held to a 0-0 draw at home by Monts d'Or Azergues, while Grenoble
went down 1-0 away at Yzeure. So as things stand Duchere are seven points
behind Grenoble but with a game in hand - which comes with a point for turning
up, so the gap could be narrowed to three points. Duchere have a five-points
lead and a game in hand over third-placed Auxerre B (a team which I believe
cannot be promoted whatever happens).
Next
Sunday will see the fixture that will go some way to determining which team
tops the league and gets automatically promoted to France's national third division
as Duchere make the short trip to Grenoble. Clearly a win for Grenoble and a
10-points gap and with 10/11 games left would leave Duchere dependent on their
rivals - who I think would consider themselves the 'bigger' team and have fans
with a poor reputation - blowing it. A draw and it still looks tough, but if
Duchere can get the victory it really will be game on for the title.
It
does get complicated (for me at least) if Duchere finish runners-up. I asked my
French partner Suzanne to look at the wording on the Foot National site to try
to explain to me the precise rules determining who goes up from the various regional
leagues and who gets relegated from National. It does seem you can finish
second in one of the four regional leagues and get promoted. I am led to
believe (but with no certainty) that at the end of the season the four bottom
teams in National will play against each other, as will the four CFA teams
which finished second in their leagues. The two victorious teams would then
have a play-off final to decide it all. But I'm still a bit confused. The Foot
National leagues show the bottom four National places highlighted as relegation
spots, and the top place in each of the four CFA groups highlighted for
promotion. I don't know how another place might come into the equation.
Suzanne
promises me she will have it all clarified by the time I next get to Lyon. I
expect to be there in mid-March, and the timings will allow for a Duchere home
game against Le Puy. It's been while for me since my last match in anger, much
longer since I last saw a Duchere goal (let alone a win), but I have high hopes
that this time around Duchere will do their bit to lift my footballing spirits.
I remember not so long ago being in Lyon and agreeing to eat some cheese if we
beat Leicester - and of course Kermorgant did the business for us. Happier days
indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment