Keep
coming back to those words from Richard Murray (I paraphrase) not long after
the takeover. ‘Roland has two objectives: to get us into the Premiership and to
break even’. There was widespread incredulity at the time of course, given the
evidence, and when predictably the financial fair play rules were scuppered the
chances of the former taking precedence pretty much went out of the window. The
fact that Roland has also failed miserably to achieve the latter we shall gloss
over for now.
Let’s
be kind and attribute those January 2014 transfer window moves to just utter
stupidity, the sort of actions undertaken by someone who knew nothing about
football and who had a seriously flawed strategy to implement. It would seem
that this time around Roland has another transfer window decision to make. We’ve
all seen the speculation regarding Karlan Ahearne-Grant and are aware of his
contract situation. Take the money on the table for a player who could walk in
the summer (even if the prices quoted are very low if the player in question
does have the potential to thrive in the Championship at least); or recognise
that selling one of our only two fit forwards when the other is not going to be
available for three games is not exactly compatible with a determined promotion
challenge, even if a replacement is brought in?
Just
depends on your priorities. Of course Roland’s have apparently changed since
early 2014. We are led to believe that selling the club is his number one
objective now. If that’s the case, it really doesn’t matter to him whether or
not Grant is sold as either way it would feed into the price – and surely any
actual purchaser of our club would at this point want some flexibility on that
front depending on whether or not we get promoted this season.
However,
if Roland has effectively given up on a sale this month, in which case the odds
on him clinging on until the summer have to shorten, he could have a real
decision to make. Now Roland isn’t very good at making real decisions. It’s one
thing to have a strategy (which is of course a brilliant one because it is his)
and to make decisions based on implementing it; it’s quite another to respond
to changing situations and conflicting requirements. That requires thinking on
your feet, which is not easy when they’re wrapped in gaffer tape.
All
we can do is wait and see. Perhaps Roland’s job here will be made easy for him,
if for example Lee Bowyer made it plain that if Grant is sold he is off too
(that is of course pure conjecture, I’m never ‘in the know’).
On
other fronts, many will be desperate to find out whether or not Lyon Duchere
progressed to the last 16 of the French cup on Tuesday evening. They did! At
half-time away at Andrezieux (to recap the team from a level below Duchere which
had dumped Marseille in the previous round) it was 1-0 to the home team, but
Duchere turned it around to triumph 2-1.
For
acceptable reasons my partner Suzanne declined the option to drive to
Andrezieux and back to watch the game, so I have only the highlights available
on the Duchere website to go on. And from those it looked like a classic case
of a game of two halves. In the first Andrezieux, presumably fired up by a
large crowd, ran Duchere ragged. Their goal was a beauty, good movement by a
fast winger to go around his man and deliver a cross to the near post which was
met by a forward more alert than his marker. It looked as though they had the
chances to put the game to bed. But didn’t.
As
the snow fell the game turned when early in the second half Duchere fashioned
an equaliser. A well-worked move which led to the ball being delivered to the
left side of the box, from where their guy, Franck Julienne, slotted it across
the keeper and into the far corner of the net. And eight minutes later they did
the same thing. Same set-up, same shot, same scorer. Given that the highlights
showed no Andrezieux chances after that, I’m assuming that Duchere saw out the
game in decent fashion without scares, and the final shot shows them
celebrating in front of perhaps 30 of their supporters, so some did make the
trip.
Now
here I have to confess to a simple mistake on my part. In my previous post I
said it seemed the framework for the cup draws was already determined, but that
was just me misreading a graphic. Instead it seems that tonight will see the draw
for the last 16 involved. Really there are just two options to set the pulses
racing: a home tie against either Olympique Lyonnais (they do have yet to get
past Amien), to give the city a real derby match, or at home to PSG (who are
through). I say ‘at home’ but in either eventuality I’m led to believe that the
game would be moved from Stade de Balmont, which is said by Wikopedia to have a
capacity of 5,600 but which would struggle to cope with the logistics of
anything like that number.
As
with the situation regarding Grant, we await further developments.
Stade Rennais would be nice....
ReplyDeleteHave to say Anon that, much as I'd welcome a look at Rennes it would be a fair treck from Lyon. Perhaps Duchere would run a coach or two in the event, that would be good.
ReplyDeleteWell it was Brittany, but not Rennes. Vitre is very winnable, but they'll fancy it too.
ReplyDeleteHi Anon. Yes, was just going to comment when I saw your one. Duchere will indeed be just down the road from you in Rennes. Will ensure at least one team from the third division or lower will be in the QFs; and as you say both teams will fancy their chances.
ReplyDelete