When
you boldly venture from the pub to the ground for your first real game of the
season, you have fairly clear objectives in easy order: a win, a clean sheet,
some entertainment. We got the entertainment, in a fashion somewhat unexpected,
but not the first two priorities. Given that when the game was suspended we
were 0-3 down and howling for more rain, but when it was formally called off it
was 1-3 at half-time against 10 men, like last Saturday, it could have been
better – and it could have been a good deal worse.
Let’s
start with the decisions taken by the referee. After the game I think I was more
sympathetic than most. He tried all he could to provide an opportunity for the
game to be concluded. The fact that at 0-3 he would have had every Doncaster
player and staff member shouting in his ear that they had no problems with the
conditions, and at the same time everyone with a Charlton association howling
for it to be called off (and, like me, offering to pour more buckets of water
on the pitch) can’t have been easy. There was no water visible on the surface,
but buckets of it just below, which made most passes and tackles difficult to
make and predict. The fact that we’d got back into the game, and they had a guy
sent off, perhaps made it easier for him, as did the fact that there’s no way
another 45 minutes could have been completed. He called it off when there was
no realistic prospect of things getting better, every chance of them getting
worse, and in addition to a sizeable element of farce danger to the players. So
show him some sympathy.
Now
to the less savoury aspects of the 45 minutes that we saw. Our defending,
individually and collectively. None of the goals they scored could be
attributed to the conditions (indeed, they would probably have scored their
second sooner had it not been for the conditions). Every ball they played
forward looked capable of producing something, especially the set pieces, when
they knew what they were going to do and we were guessing. We’ve conceded two
against Bournemouth, two against Barnsley, one against Middlesbrough, and three
in 45 minutes against Doncaster. I can’t comment on what’s gone before, but
today it was rank. If we don’t get this sorted out, and quick, we are in
trouble.
The
game had barely begun when a throw to them on the right side was delivered to
one of their front two, in acres of space. It was on Wiggins’ side, but is it
his job to pick up the guy behind him? He crossed, they scored simply. Second
goal saw a ball across the box which, fortunately for us, stuck in the area
instead of going to their guy to score. Hamer hoofed it away, only for the ball
to be played forward again, Morrison to throw his arm up for an offside that
never was, and for it to go wide, ball in again and a simply conversion from
their big centre-forward. Goal three was a corner played to the back of the
box, to a guy with nobody around him, allowing him to put in a forceful header
which was parried but rebounded off one of theirs into the net. Unlucky
perhaps, but who was picking up the first guy?
Add
in the fact that other set pieces saw their guys set up prepared plays and came
close to scoring more, with us chasing shadows, and you had what amounted to
chaos in defence.
At
the other end things were a good deal better. We forced three excellent saves
from their keeper and looked capable of scoring, helped by the movement of
Church and the perseverance of Kermorgant. With Gower winning his fair share of
tackles and Cousins looking accomplished, plus Harriott’s pace, there was every
reason to believe that we’d get some on the scoresheet. But if you’re shipping
goals at the back it just doesn’t mean that much. Fact is we were 0-3 down when
the game was suspended and at that point all we wanted was the clouds to open.
The
18 minutes after the break to complete the first half saw Church convert a
loose ball in the box to give us hope, then their guy put in the sort of five
minutes that must make any manager despair. You’re well up away from home, look
capable of scoring more, so the priority has to be not to let the opposition
back in. Instead he clattered into the back of Kermorgant (and then possibly
kicked the ball away) to pick up a yellow, then minutes later got involved in a
water-induced scrap to get a merited second. Muppet.
The
positives today were Church and Cousins. But if we continue to defend in today’s
fashion, we’re in trouble. I can’t pinpoint the reason, that’s for Sir Chris
and his staff. But forget the idea that the conditions were to blame. Defend
like that and you lose. Period.
3 comments:
I had to come on here and read your drivel, as to how you would justify todays injustice.
One can easily imagine the tone of your prose if Charlton were 3 to 1 in front and someone suggested calling the game off because of a water logged pitch. You would have defended your corner with your life. Even if waves rippled across the pitch you would have insisted on the game being played out.
Tom.
Tom - tough luck son - you will get another crack when hopefully it's dry. BA's been reasonably charitable by saying the first three goals were not water-affected. Not sure the players would all agree. The pitch was unplayable in large places after the stoppage. We appeared to avoid our left flank because it had become a paddy field.
Thanks for the defence Dave and yes I guess the conditions might have been affecting our play (although leaving a centre-forward completely unmarked just outside the box from a throw, and allowing a guy a free header inside the box from a corner was just rank play). Tom, no hard feelings. You're quite right if we were up I'd have wanted it to continue. That's the way the cookie crumbles.
Funnily enough, I watched Lyon v Rheims last night on the box. A downpour in the last 15 mins of the first half turned their pitch into a similar condition. The ref extended half time and with the rain having stopped (unlike at The Valley) and a break of over half an hour they managed to complete the game (much to Lyon's disgust as they lost 0-1).
Post a Comment